Skip to content
Empire Center UK

The Venezuelan Crisis Could Now Define President Trump's Legacy - and the United States' Position in the World

In the wake of launching a evening of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump now appears to be entering the nation-building business.

In a remarkable press conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate on Saturday morning, the president declared that US military forces had successfully seized Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then announced that a group comprising Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, collaborating with Venezuelans, would be assuming control of the troubled nation.

"We are going to administer the country until such time as we can do a secure, proper and careful transition," he said.

What precisely "running the country" involves is unclear, but the commitment represents an sudden shift in direction for the president, rife with contradictions and significant obstacles.

A president who campaigned against "forever wars", who vehemently denounced past US efforts at regime change and who vowed to implement an "America First" foreign policy is now betting his presidency on effectively revitalizing a South American nation whose economic system is in shambles and whose political stability has been eroded by years of dictatorship.

Yet, Trump was unwaveringly optimistic.

He stated his administration has a "unblemished record of winning" – and that this will be no different. He pledged to recruit American energy companies to overhaul Venezuela's crumbling production infrastructure, supplying funds for the American reconstruction efforts and benefitting the Venezuelan people.

He declined to rule out deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to further these efforts. "We do not fear boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he informed reporters.

Trump, a vocal opponent of the US intervention of Iraq, will now have to remember the words of one of the American planners of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "You break it, you bought it."

An Altered International Stance

The US has redefined Venezuela's destiny – whether for good or ill.

Trump took office nearly a year ago promising to be a diplomat, but over the past year he has demonstrated that he is quite prepared to use military force around the globe.

In the past week, he ordered air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he struck atomic sites in Iran, alleged drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, rebel forces in Yemen, armed groups in Somalia and Islamic militants in Iraq.

Unlike previous operations, which have mostly involved missiles and aircraft that reduce the exposure of American forces to harm, Trump's Venezuela operation – and his commitments to the fate of that nation – are strikingly different.

His objective, he said during his press conference, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Response at Home and Abroad

That variation of Trump's "MAGA" – or Maga - mantra could be tough for some of Trump's backers to digest.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump loyalist who split from the president after accusing him of abandoning his core supporters, was swift to denounce the president's actions on social media.

"Public outrage with our own government's perpetual military aggression and support of foreign wars is justified because we are forced to finance it," she wrote. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. How mistaken we were."

Another notable Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, compared the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on arms and cocaine trafficking charges – with Trump's explanation that the operation was to reclaim seized US oil and halt fentanyl production.

The majority of Republican lawmakers stood by the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the armed intervention against a "illegitimate government" as "decisive and justified".

Strategic Justifications and Global Implications

During his press conference, the president said the Venezuelan operation advanced his "America First" priorities because it ensured US regional security and provided a reliable source of oil.

He resurrected the Monroe Doctrine – an nineteenth-century American foreign policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Trump Doctrine."

The action in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will never be challenged again."

The goal of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "safeguard commerce, land and assets that are central to our national security." He labeled the Western Hemisphere as America's "home region."

Trump's choice to capture Maduro will raise larger questions in international relations, however, and affect American ties with the world's other significant global powers.

The Chinese government issued a statement expressing surprise and denouncing what it said was a reckless attack on a sovereign nation.

During the previous administration, the US offered similar censures of Russia after its incursion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is attempting to broker a peace deal between those two nations – one that has often appeared to be leaning to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, voiced worry about the message Trump's actions might send.

"My main concern is now Russia will use this to justify their unlawful and barbaric operations against Ukraine, or China to justify an invasion of Taiwan."

Political Criticism and Constitutional Questions

Trump's Democratic critics were more direct.

"America should not be running other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee. "We should have understood by now not to get entangled in endless wars and overthrow attempts that carry devastating consequences for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker stated Maduro is a criminal and a autocrat with a record of human rights abuses. But he censured Trump's choice not to inform legislative leaders prior to initiating the attack.

"Donald Trump has the constitutional responsibility to abide by the law and protect institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what placing America First demands."

Trump, in his press conference, explained that he chose not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "disclose" particulars of the operation before the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That military operation was a success – with no American casualties and minimal damage to US assets. Trump, with his typical bravado, portrayed the operation as a "spectacular assault" and "among the most stunning, effective and impressive demonstrations of American military might and proficiency in American history."

Now he is betting his presidency on that success enduring, as the US says it will assume responsibility for running and rebuilding Venezuela - though what that actually means is unclear. He and his administration must rebuild a nation that has been in chaos for years while stabilising a hemisphere that is bound to be apprehensive of what Trump's foreign policy has in store for them.

BH
About the author

Brian Hamilton

A political analyst and writer specializing in UK-EU relations and constitutional affairs, with over a decade of experience in Westminster.

Empire Center UK

Type to search articles.